Between the retirement boom of the laziest generation to Gen Z only staying at a company on average for about one year in the early part of their careers, to AI being predicted to replace everything to loyality is practically gone to the huge divide on many things to rising inequality, rise of socialistic ideals, to the world changing so fast in many unpredictable way and everything else, it’s safe to say the last thing you probably want is more liabilities, commitment and uncertainties. Mental health and happiness is important hence a lot of young people put much emphasis on work life balance. We literally live in a world where video interviews can replace physical interviews and humanoid robots can replace humans for many tasks, including the ones I probably can’t even talk about here. Pretty soon, perhaps biological roles for millenniums might be altered due to alternatives to primitive proliferation methods. There is a reason why the wealthier the demographics group, the less babies they want to have. Even poor countries like America’s number one nemesis is declining significantly in population. The further away people are from existential survival mode, the more they will want a higher quality of life that entails them being the happiest they could be in whatever format within an allowable range within the confines of a society’s structural social contract. The entire marriage law is predicated based on the unspoken/undercurrent of the woman has more rights to the offspring than the man does due to carriage, pain, women being more caring and women being the more vulnerable party in a marriage.
All of this obviously is an outgrowth from the fact that one is almost never right opening or not opening up the door for a woman and many other unresolved social norm ambiguities in the gender relationships. Having a baby is a huge commitment of time, money and energy for all parties. Having a baby is also a social entanglement event that ties up parties who may not like each other who are forced to work with each other for a long period of time. DINKing, while not having a baby, it’s still getting into a relationship or preserving a relationship with economic interests as an incentive for being with each other in some ways with having a baby always a potential threat in this relationship. First of all, unless you are wealthy, the baby that you raise no matter how much you love him or her will still end up serving a society that benefits the wealthy due to inequality in resource distribution percentages/ratios. If you don’t have capital to begin with, you will almost always earn less than the “risk takers” who “risked” their capital in whatever venture. Why are you bringing another human being into this world who will suffer like you do being not extremely wealthy just for the benefit of the extreme wealthy? The marriage laws from those who support the “be an ally” crowd ultimately make marriages burdensomely insufferable and unequal. Semi quoting a famous person who may have said he likes temporary/acting positions.
I live in America which means I have the rights to exercise reasonable free speech as permitted by the law. All posted content(s) on this website are my opinions only which means they should not be taken as advice of any kind. I am a non-celebrity, non-public figure posting anonymously for my own entertainment on a website that is not affiliated with any individual(s), organization(s) and/or any entity/entities.
Why having babies and DINKing are both terrible ideas due to current marriage laws and social equivocation.
Perhaps marriages should be the same way to give more “flexibility.” In an age most Western countries have personal bankruptcy laws, why can’t there be concepts similar personal bankruptcy law principles applied to marriages where marriages can be terminated at anytime unilaterally without any harm done to either parties and the baby can go to the state welfare system for the patrons of the “be an ally” crowd to raise them on their own dimes since they are the biggest beneficiaries of society being the way it is now. Yes, of course this is class brinkmanship but it is also the economic reality as well. Even America’s biggest enemy, the evilest country and entity in this world who harvest organs and enslave people, is unable to force people to have babies. Why? Because they want the same people who have babies also raise the babies on their own dimes in a high quality way. Having babies is a losing proposition regardless whether there is a tax on condoms or not. A baby will cost the primary bread maker everything they have between taking care of the baby and taking care of the person who supposedly take care of them and the baby. Then someone tells them the custody to the baby after the divorce should go to the woman and they have to pay much of their income for child support and alimony even if they had a prenup. Then society also favors the woman in every implicitly bias way. What man under these conditions would wisely and willingness want babies or any legally binding potential relationships if they knew any better or thought through it thoroughly.
That’s why they want men to marry early because the more they think about it and the older they get, the less they want to get married. Once they work in workplaces with even a few people from certain demographic groups, they probably would have a different opinion on marriage. It’s almost never about being fertile as many men can still reproduce in their 50s and 60s or older, it’s all about the time pressure tacit within the confines of “a sucker is born every day/ignorance is bliss” BS. A country like South Korea, however I may think about its societal structure/appeasement of America’s number one enemy etc., is pouring massive amount of resources in order to see a slight upward increase in birth rates. The lesson here is, having a baby doesn’t benefit the regular people as much as it benefits the elite controlled structural society. Regular people should get massive incentives to maintain this structure or the elites can replace current reproduction methods with technology. Either way, as long as the elites still want other people to create future soldiers and modern slaves for them, they need to pay for it. Nothing is free in life, not even for the elites. If the elites want DEI instead of MEI, they should pay for all that to maintain “societal harmony.” The number one enemy of America is spending a large portion of their GDP on such infrastructure including human capital in maintaining their system of oppression, the elites in the West will not get a “hometown discount” nor a free pass on that. They should pay for it just like any other control carving entities do.
After all, bride buying, bride abductions and bride prices still exist. Why don’t the “be an ally” crowd and their patron saints do something about that? They can’t and won’t. Because they are only able to work within a democracy through money lobbies and will chicken out against real organ harvesting, gulag building, genocide conducting, oppressive pure evilnatis. They funded these people throughout the centuries like they funded Japan during the Russo war, they are constantly telling us their people and governments are two different thing yet it’s people are enabling the government. These funders should be on the frontlines to fight these people and the government not the regular American aligned people. The regular people should hold these funders and their associates now or in the future through blood ties or otherwise responsible in pepertuity. This is how America’s number one enemy does it. What gets a lot of people upset is the oldest profession in the world historically has always been somewhat allowed for many different reasons yet the elites have lobbied for laws that force people to get married just to secure what they need biologically and economically instead of this being a freely transactional exchange without any obligations with state provided testing, prevention and protection that could be afforded to both parties equally and institutionalized through the issuance of business licenses and promoted utilizing both stage and private communication apparatuses in a morally condoning way as part of true equality where genders rely on their own merits and utilize whatever gifts and natural abilities they were granted to get whatever they need. That’s true equality not handouts from other people’s pockets. That’s how various demographics can earn true respect in the context of inter-demographic relations where different parties feel like they AEI (Actually Earned It) not DEI. No matter how much the elites tries make marriage into something sentimental and inspirational like love and faith, the daily grind of living will always bring it back to salt and butter. If the elite refuse to resolve the problems they brought upon generational I, why should they bring the same issues upon generational II who are probably better being unborn in the first place under such conditions. Especially a baby can’t be made without the DNA of a man yet the elite through their apparatuses try to convince people the other party is more important in this whole process including the raising of the baby. At some point some people are going to say something akin to “no reproduction without equal representation.”